Once you have registered for the course, please send me your contact information
immediately. Then I will send you all the information you need to access the
course content.
SES 2999H: Special Topics in Sociological Research in Education: Women, Technology and Society
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
Sociology and Equity Studies
Winter 2008
Contact:
Alyson E. King, Ph.D.
aking@oise.utoronto.ca or via WebKF
Technologies are an integral part of all societies. How do we define technologies?
Are some technologies, such as cars, masculine and others, like washing machines,
feminine? Do technologies help to define identity? What role(s) do race and
class play in the formation of technologies? What role does science play
in the creation and evolution of gendered technologies? This course will
explore the impact of gender on technologies, the impact of technology on
society and of society on technology. We will look at what science and technology
have said about women and how preconceived notions about women and gender
have shaped science and technology.
This course is offered online using WebKF. When you register for the course you MUST send me an e-mail so that you can have access to the course and course materials in a timely manner.
Assessment
Participation |
15% |
|---|---|
Proposal & Annotated Bibliography DUE Monday,
February 4, 2008 |
25% |
Presentation (online) DUE March 17, 2008 |
5% |
Peer Review |
10% |
Final Research Paper DUE
Thursday, May
1, 2008 |
45% |
Participation: Participation involves being active on a regular basis in the
online discussion every
week and taking responsibility for leading and summarizing the discussion for
one week.
Proposal and Annotated Bibliography: You must provide an annotated bibliography
for your
final research paper. Your annotations should include a short overview of the
source and why it is
important for your research. You must have a minimum of 15 sources (books,
articles, and other
resources). You may use websites as long as they are from a reliable source
and are appropriate to
the level of research you are undertaking (i.e., don’t use
Wikipedia or similar websites). DUE:
Monday, February 4, 2008.
Presentation: Your presentation of your research should include a description
of your topic, why
you chose your topic, your approach and/or methodology, any questions/problems
that have arisen
during your research, and a draft of your paper. You must submit your presentation
to the online
forum by March 17, 2008.
Peer Review: You are required to review a minimum of four presentations and
comment on them.
Your comments should be presented in a professional manner and should provide
constructive
criticism, praise and/or suggestions for improvements. Peer Reviews will be
conducted over a two
week period: the weeks of March 17 and 24, 2008.
Final Paper: Your final paper can be on a topic of your choice related to women,
technology and
society. The paper should be approximately 5,000 words in length and properly
formatted and
footnoted. DUE: Thursday, May 1, 2008
**NOTE: All assignments are to submitted electronically.**
Texts:
Mary Frank Fox, Deborah G. Johnson, and Sue V. Rosser, eds.
Women, Gender, and Technology
(Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2006). ISBN: 0-252-07336-3
[Articles in this
text may also be found in their original journal publications.]
Ursula Franklin, The Real World of Technology (Toronto: Anansi Press, rev.
ed. 1999). ISBN: 0-
88784-636-X
Cecilia Ng and Swasti Mitter, eds. Gender and the Digital Economy:
Perspectives from the Developing World (New Dehli: SAGE Publications, 2005).
ISBN: 0-7619-3410-3
Judy Wajcman, TechnoFeminism (Cambridge: Polity, 2004). ISBN: 0-7456-3044-8
Course Schedule
Introduction
Week of January 7, 2008
Welcome and introductions. What does technology mean to you?
Ursula Franklin, The Real World of Technology (Toronto: Anansi Press, rev.
ed.1999).
Historical Context: Everyday Technologies
Week of January 14
Rachel P. Maines, “Socially Camouflaged Technologies: the
Case of the
Electromechanical Vibrator,” IEEE Technology and Society
Magazine 8 (1989): 3-
11.
Arwen P. Mohun, “Laundrymen Construct their World: Gender and the Transformation of a Domestic Task to an Industrial Process,” Technology and Culture 38, no. 1 (1997): 97-120.
Wendy Gamber, “‘Reduced to Science’: Gender,
Technology and Power in the American Dressmaking Trade, 1860-1910,” Technology
and Culture 36, no. 3 (1995): 455-82.
Joy Parr, “What Makes Washday Less Blue? Gender, Nation,
and Technology Choice in Postwar Canada,” Technology and Culture
38, no. 1 (1997): 153-86.
Feminism and Technology
Week of January 21
“Introduction: Feminist Utopia or Dystopia?” in Wajcman.
Chapter 1: “Male Designs on Technology” in Wajcman.
Chapter 2: “Technoscience Reconfigured” in Wajcman.
Monica Casper and Adele Clarke, “Making the Pap smear into the ‘right
tool’ for the job:
cervical cancer screening in the USA, circa 1945-95,” Social
Studies of Science,
28 (1998), pp. 255-90.
Week of January 28
Chapter 3: “Virtual Gender” in Wajcman.
Chapter 4: “The Cyborg Solution” in Wajcman.
Donna Haraway, "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and
Socialist-Feminism in the
Late Twentieth Century," in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The
Reinvention of
Nature (New York; Routledge, 1991), pp.149-181. Available online at
http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Haraway/CyborgManifesto.html .
Chapter 5: “Metaphor and Materiality” in Wajcman.
Gender, Technology and Development
Week of February 4
Chapter 1, “Gender and Empowerment in the Information Economy: An
Introduction” in
Ng and Mitter.
Chapter 2, “Globalization, ICTs, and Economic Empowerment: A Feminist
Critique” in
Ng and Mitter.
Chapter 3, “From ‘Information’ to ‘Knowledge’ Societies?” in
Ng and Mitter.
Week of February 11
[Read at least 3 of the 5 chapters listed.]
Chapter 4, “Female Spaces in the Philippines’ ICT Industry” in
Ng and Mitter.
Chapter 5, “Women’s Agency and the IT Industry in India” in
Ng and Mitter.
Chapter 6, “Valuing Women’s Voices: Call Center Workers in
Malaysia and India” in Ng
and Mitter.
Chapter 7, “Women Weavers OnLine: Rural Moroccan Women on the Internet” in
Ng and
Mitter
Chapter 8, “Virtual Community Building for Networking among Women” in
Ng and
Mitter.
Week of February 18
Chapter 9, “Gender-Net: A Political Goal of Communication Technologies” in
Ng and
Mitter.
Chapter 10, “Thinking BIG to Accelerate Gender Equality and
Transformation in the ICT
Arena” in Ng and Mitter.
Co-Creation of Technology
Week of February 25
Chapter 1, “Using the Lenses of Feminist Theories to Focus
on Women and Technology”
in Fox, et al.
Chapter 2, “Women, Men and Engineering” in Fox, et
al.
Chapter 3, “Still a Chilly Climate for Women Students in Technology:
A Case Study” in
Fox, et al.
Chapter 4, “The Feminization of Work in the Information Age” in
Fox, et al.
Week of March 3
Chapter 5, “Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and the Digital Divide” in
Fox, et al.
Chapter 6, “Genetic Technology and Women” in Fox, et
al.
Chapter 7, “Some Unintended Consequences of New Reproductive
and Information
Technologies on the Experience of Pregnancy Loss” in Fox,
et al.
Week of March 10: MARCH BREAK
Presentations
Week of March 17
Submit presentations/rough drafts by Sunday night (please submit on time
so that everyone
has a chance to read them). Discuss at least two submissions this week
and then at least
two more next week. (You are welcome to discuss more than four presentations.
If there
are a lot of reviews of any particular submission, please take the initiative
and choose one
that does not have many reviews yet.)
Week of March 24: Presentations
Conclusion
Week of March 31: Conclusions and Reflections
IMPORTANT MATTERS REGARDING ESSAYS
1. Essays must be double-spaced and typed. Pages must be numbered. Proper
scholarly form
must be used. You must use either MLA or Chicago Manual of Style for formatting
citations
and bibliographies.
2. PLAGIARISM is an extremely serious academic offence
and carries penalties varying from
failure in an assignment to suspension from the University. Definitions,
penalties and
procedures for dealing with plagiarism are set out in the University
of Toronto’s "Academic
Dishonesty Policy" which is printed in the Calendar.
3. For your protection: because assignments sometimes get lost, and because
questions of
authorship sometimes arise, it is essential that you be able to document
your creative process
in producing assignments. You must keep your research notes and rough drafts
for essays and
assignments, even after the finished work has been graded and returned.
If composing on a
computer, preserve copies of work in progress at regular intervals so that
you have a track
record of how the assignment evolved. Print hard copies of the work at
different stages, or use
the ‘save as’ function on the computer to record successive
drafts. The sequence of drafts
should be carefully noted. An inability to provide these materials,
if requested, will constitute
grounds for failure on the assignment and will result in a report kept
on file in the Department
of Sociology and Equity Studies.
4. All assignments must be original, produced by you, and prepared for
this course alone. An
essay prepared for or used in another course will be failed automatically.
If you are drawing
from assignments done for previous or current courses, you must notify
me beforehand.
Late papers will be accepted only if there is a legitimate reason for the
delay. Essays are to be
submitted electronically. If you submit an essay in any other way, you
assume all risk that it does
not go astray.
Disclaimer
This outline documents the instructor’s intentions for this course. Over the period of the term, it may become clear that some modifications may be necessary. Any modifications that may influence student success or the marking scheme will be made only after frank discussion with the students and the prior approval of the chair. I reserve the right to use any methods, including electronic means, to detect and help prevent plagiarism. Students agree that by taking this course all assignments are subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com. Assignments submitted to Turnitin.com will be included as source documents in Turnitin.com's restricted access database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism in such documents for five academic years. The faculty member may require students to submit their assignments electronically to Turnitin.com or the faculty member may submit questionable text on behalf of a student. |
|---|