Nomination & Selection Process
Nominations for OISE Teaching Awards for 2026-2027 are now open. Nominate an OISE teacher who inspires you by January 29, 2027!
Nomination Requirements
Strong nominations move beyond describing activities and responsibilities. They provide evidence of impact, demonstrating how the nominee’s contributions have influenced students, colleagues, programs, educational practice, institutions, or the broader profession. Therefore, the nomination package should provide clear and compelling evidence of excellence in each of the required award criteria, demonstrating both the quality and impact of the nominee’s contributions, with specific examples wherever possible.
Nomination packages must be submitted by a Lead Nominator who is responsible for working with the nominee to develop the nomination package, coordinating input from other contributors, and ensuring the support of at least three co-nominators for the nomination. Co-nominators are not required to submit letters of support but may do so if appropriate.
Nomination Package
Please observe the following guidelines when preparing a nomination package:
- Please keep the nomination package succinct (a maximum of 35 pages in total – not including the cover page and table of contents);
- Use 12-point font with one-inch margins; text can be single-spaced;
- Each page must be numbered;
- The file must be compiled in one PDF and submitted via email to oise.programs@utoronto.ca by the nomination deadline;
- The nomination package must include letters of support attesting to the nominee’s excellence in the criteria relevant to the award for which they are nominated.
- The nominee’s CV is not included in the page count and should be submitted as a separate attachment;
- Do not include copies of entire articles/books/textbooks with the nomination; however, clips and excerpts of, or links to, these materials may be included.
- Consult with the nominee regarding the preparation of the Statement of Teaching Philosophy, or the Statement of Supervision Philosophy (for the David E. Hunt Award), or the Educational Leadership Statement (for the Excellence in Educational Leadership Awar). The nominee should also be consulted regarding letters of support and other relevant supporting materials.
Please download and use the latest Guidelines for Preparing an OISE Teaching Award Nomination Package for information and advice on how to structure/organize your nomination package. The Guidelines also include examples of excellence in teaching and educational leadership.
Nominee's Curriculum Vitae (CV)
- Please note that the nominee’s CV is not included in the page count and should be submitted as a separate attachment.
Nominee's Involvement
- You will need to involve the nominee in the process of preparing the nomination package. They will need to prepare a statement and should be consulted with regard to letters of support and other relevant supporting materials.
Considering Resubmitting a Nomination from a Previous Year?
Unsuccessful nominations may be resubmitted for up to three (3) consecutive years. Each resubmission must be accompanied by an updated nomination brief, an updated nomination letter, as well as an updated nominee’s statement of teaching philosophy and the CV. It is the lead nominator’s responsibility to contact all previous supporters for permission to carry forward letters of support.
Please note that the Teaching Awards Selection Committee membership, as well as the pool of applications, changes annually and resubmission is not a guarantee that the nomination will be successful.
Unsuccessful nominations that exceed the three-year limit may be resubmitted after a one-year hiatus, provided that a new nomination package is assembled. It is the responsibility of the lead nominator to retain copies of the complete nomination package for future reference or resubmissions.
To resubmit a nomination, please email oise.programs@utoronto.ca.
Selection Procedure
The Teaching Awards are adjudicated by a Selection Committee appointed by the Dean and chaired by the Associate Dean, Programs. Comprised of representatives of faculty, students and staff from across OISE’s academic departments, a new Selection Committee is established every two years to ensure broad representation and diverse perspectives. This means that once appointed to the Committee, the Selection Committee members serve for two consecutive years.
Note: Members of the Teaching Awards Selection Committee cannot submit or endorse any nominations, nor can they be nominated for any of the teaching awards while serving on the Committee. If a member of the Teaching Awards Selection Committee is nominated for an OISE Teaching Award during their term on the Committee, they may resign from the Committee in order to pursue the nomination. In such a case, the Selection Committee Chair will consult with the Department Chair to appoint another faculty member to serve on the Selection Committee.
The selection process will be conducted according to peer-review principles [see Lamont, Michèle (2009), How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment, Harvard University Press].
In evaluating nominations, reviewers will consider the quality, significance, and impact of the evidence presented, considering disciplinary, programmatic, and professional contexts.
Committee members will use a rubric to aid in the evaluation and initial ranking of the nominations, and to help them prepare for the discussion during the Selection Committee meeting.
The final decision will be made holistically through collective deliberation, with the objective of reaching consensus whenever possible.
Selection Committee deliberations are confidential. Only the final decision is recorded. The rubrics and the written notes taken during deliberations are destroyed at the conclusion of the process. Decisions are communicated to all nominees, but no feedback (other than procedural feedback) is provided.
Inquiries regarding OISE’s Teaching Excellence Awards and nomination procedures should be directed to: oise.programs@utoronto.ca